| |
![]() |
Fenix TK10 LED Flashlight Review*
by Bill Kincaid
|
Fenix TK10 LED Flashlight Specifications: |
Estimated Release Date: March 25, 2008 |
Designed for Rugged Outdoor and Military use |
Cree 7090 XRE Premium Q5 LED (50,000 Hour Lifespan) |
High Efficient Parabolic OP Reflector |
Two brightness modes: 225 Lumens: 1.5 Hours / 60 Lumens: 10 Hours |
Digitally regulated for constant brightness |
Removable Steel Clip with supplied Allen wrench and two extra screws included |
Removable Tactical Grip Ring for the cigar technique included (made of Grade T6 aircraft aluminum) |
Rubber Switch Boot included (edit: see findings below) |
Two spare O-Rings included (One for the head and one for the tail cap) |
Both a Black and an Orange rubber switch boot included. (Black installed) Having both included was a
very nice touch. |
Dimensions: 135 mm x 34 mm (25.4mm = 1.0 inch - Sorry left the RPN HP at the office) |
Weight: 136g excluding batteries |
Takes two CR123A batteries (Not Included) |
Body Construction: Aircraft Grade Aluminum |
Toughened ultra clear glass lens with anti-reflective coating |
Premium Type III Hard Anodized Anti-Abrasive Finish |
Water resistant to IPX-8 Standard |
Reverse polarity protection |
Low battery indication system |
Lanyard included |
Holster included |
Estimated street price: $75.00 US |
Test Findings and Observations for Fenix TK10:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Dropped 4 times at a distance of 4 feet onto a folded towel placed on a Concrete floor. No damage
detected. Testing that the components were mounted solid and would not easily come loose was the
only test (that could have been destructive) I was comfortable with since I new this light would be
used and depended on, sold with full disclosure, or given away.
|
|
|
-
The finish was beautiful. There were no machining marks anywhere I could find on my sample. There were no uneven spots in the HA-III coating. The head, battery tube, and tail cap all matched as though they were polished and coated together as one piece. A very nice looking light and better looking than its predecessor. IMHO. My pictures don't give it proper justice.
|
|
-
Target identification was listed out to 200 Meters and I thought I should touch on this. I have no 200 meter beam shots but my tests confirm the light will shine this far especially in a completely dark atmosphere. In my tests at 105 meters there was plenty of light. After 150 meters the quantity of light starts falling off to the point that these old eyes start straining. If I really wanted or needed to light up an area 200 meters away on more than just a rare occasion, I would want something with a little more kick. Remember this is my opinion only and the quantity of light you need at 200 meters may be less than I feel I need.
|
|
|
-
The removable belt clip is thick and stiff. It takes two fingers to pull it away from the light and is the way I think a clip should be. It should securely hold the light on the belt and still allow the light to be easily removed. It almost appears in the pictures as though it would move with the head. It does not. Once tightened in place the clip does not move. I did have a problem with the screws. In my opinion the metal is too soft and while tightening the Allen wrench it twisted inside the screw heads. If you don't plan on taking the clip on and off often you should be ok, plus there was an extra set of screws. Fenix will definitely have to provide better quality screws. With the tactical ring in place I found the belt clip very difficult if not impossible to use because the tactical ring is in the way. I'm not sure if they were designed to be used together or not; wouldn't some users want to use the belt clip and tactical ring? It is also interesting I have not seen any pictures of both installed on the light. So, I took a close up picture of the light with both the tactical ring and the belt clip installed.
|
|
|
|
-
The Switch boot is a dark burnt orange color. I really thought it complimented the finish of the light much better than the bright orange shown in preliminary pictures. This is used for covering the threads when the tactical grip ring is removed and not used. The manual says it is rubber, but it sure felt like aluminum to me and it was threaded on the inside. I believe one of the photographs shows this. I tried crushing it between my fingers, (lightly of course) and it is very firm like aluminum. I doubt it is rubber unless it is a formula I'm not familiar with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
The tint was different than any LED light I own but also to my liking. That's a lottery game we all play when we purchase lights on the Web. I like the warm sometimes slightly green if I can have it. The tint on the TK10 was white and very warm, and almost appeared to have a little red in it when compared to my Surefire G2 with BOG-Q5 and Olight T20-Q5. Both have a very cool white beam that looks blue when compared to the FenixTK10. I'm not sure if this will come out in the pictures or not. Color is hard to capture correctly with imperfect white balance and the fast shutter speeds of a camera.
|
-
Both the Fenix TK10 (225 lumens) and the G2 with BOG-Q5 drop in (230 lumens) had around the same size spot at short distances with the TK10 having a soft corona around its core. Also both lights visually appeared around the same brightness with a slight edge going to the Fenix. The two completely different tints made it impossible to determine which was actually brighter, but again I thought the Fenix TK10 was. One thing I have learned. I am not using a light meter and visual interpretations are sometimes misleading, especially when dealing with different colors. Both lights have excellent spots and are bright! Again I'm not sure how much of this will be detailed in a picture.
|
-
The Reflector is an Orange Peel type. I believe I read somewhere that Fenix will not be issuing the TK10 with a Smooth reflector. Based on the beam quality of my sample I can understand why. Visually the rings are very well controlled. At short distances there is a bright spot, a very small soft corona around the spot and then the spill. There is just a hint of interruption just past the soft corona but you really have to strain to see it and it does not show in the pictures. Out of the now 6 Q5-led lights I own, the TK10 has the best beam quality and tint hands down. All of my other Q5 flashlights have noticeable rings. Of course the TK10 also has the biggest head of all my Q5 lights. I hope my sample is indicative of all the TK10's, and not just a unique and unusual sample. Everyone should experience the Q5 like this. See the first two beam shot photographs taken at two or three feet. If the picture of the TK10's beam doesn't bring a tear to your eye, then you're not a true flashaholic. Notice the rings in the BOG and the lack of rings and very smooth beam of the TK10. Well believe it or not it only gets better as it opens up. The spill on the Fenix TK10 is just a solid wall of light with no rings and no artifacts.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
For the comparative beam shots I used a favorite of mine the Surefire G2 with BOG-Q5 drop in already mentioned. I have always liked the material and feel of my old faithful companion the G2, (it was the first high quality flashlight I purchased many years ago) and using it made sense because the BOG-Q5 is listed at 230 lumens. I also took a comparative shot with the only other two cell LED flashlight I own, the Olight T20-Q5 listed at 205 lumens on high. Another flashlight I'm fond of. All flashlights had fresh Streamlight batteries. A Fujifilm S6000fd digital camera was used for all pictures and a Bushnell Laser Range finder for distance measurements throughout this review. The distance beam shots were taken at 43 meters. Any further out and I just couldn't get enough light to take a decent beam shot and the spots opened up to large. I also should have taken a tripod due to the slow shutter speeds. So each flashlight would not affect the other I took 3 separate beam shots. One shot of each light at the exact same camera settings. All three 43 meter shots were shot at ISO 1600, one quarter (1/4) second, @ f3.5. In my opinion, the spot on the Fenix TK10 while larger, maintains its core brightness better than the other two lights, plus it lights up a larger area. Your interpretations of the pictures may be different. In my outdoor testing the tint of the FenixTK10 also allowed it to better illuminate objects at further and further distances. While the spot was tighter on the BOG-Q5 and the Olight T20-Q5, the very cool white beam both had just seemed to wash out faster than the Fenix TK10, especially when shining them in the woods. One thing is now for sure after my night time testing. I won't be selling my Fenix TK10 anytime soon. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Summary: |
Except on limited occasions, my life is not usually in situations where I would consider a flashlight necessary to make any profound differences. Flashlights just make my life much more convenient, and ok I admit it, I enjoy playing with them. I mostly prefer small one cell lights safely tucked in a pocket, patiently waiting on the moment I feel like pestering my wife, the kids or innocent bystanders. This is the reason I was never really interested in the T1. However, many groups and individuals must depend on a flashlight to make a consequential difference in the outcome of everyday activities, or an unfortunate event. For some the most important feature of a light is that it is perdurable and works time and time again when it needs to. You wouldn't want to be stuck in a cave with a couple of lights that quit the first time you dropped them or got them wet, or be a crime scene investigator ready to collect crucial evidence in the middle of the night and be fumbling around with a dim and inferior quality light. For those that serve and protect the need for a reliable light could fill a page. As with any new potentially life saving outdoor or tactical device, it needs to earn and prove its worthiness.
My impression, and based on my limited testing in the very short time I have had this flashlight, it is without a doubt heavy duty and rugged just like its predecessor, and most importantly, should work when you need it to even after taking a fair amount of punishment. It is bright by almost anyone's standards, has a beautiful beam and good throw for long range target acquisition, a lower mode for medium range work and all night usage on one set of batteries, and can be modified to suit different types of usage and carry styles. Fenix is clearly listening to their customers and taking definitive steps to keep the new tactical lines moving forward. The swift response on making a removable clip, better designed tail switch, and new tactical ring, is proof of that. However the light is not perfect. Some will vacillate because of their disappointment in the Fenix TK10's inability to take standard Drop Ins so the light is user upgradeable, or its inability to use rechargeable 18650 Lithium-Ion batteries. The Fenix TK10 was surprisingly smaller than I thought but still slightly larger than some other proven tactical lights. I also suppose that though highly debated, and even more on a tactical light, a small few would argue for the SOS or Strobe, especially for outdoor use. The screws are troublesome as is the belt clip and tactical ring not playing together very well. Lastly, in my opinion 200 meters was slightly stretching the usable distance, probably due to the OP reflector. I would not count any updates or new features out in the future as these exciting tactical lines continue to evolve for Fenix.
I'll conclude by saying that despite the impugnable short comings I've listed during the course of this review, the present features of the Fenix TK10 did impress me and win me over, and should make it a serious consideration for anyone needing its mixture of ruggedness, brightness and throw, tactical features, and now changeable body features.
|
*The preceding in-depth review was supplied by a customer of BrightGuy, Inc. (with the author's permission). The opinions expressed in this review are those of its author. BrightGuy assumes no responsibility for the information provided in this independent review. |
| |
| |
|